Cuba

May 23, 2008

The Che Chronicles

How many people really think of Che Guevara as a romantic, if occasionally headstrong, revolutionary? Outside Latin America, I mean. Perhaps it's a generational thing, but does anyone under the age of 35 really give even half a damn about Che Guevara?

Certainly, the anti-Che forces continue to write as though he remained a clear, present, danger to all things good and holy. Here's John J Miller at The Corner, for instance:
I have no objection to a movie about the life of Che Guevara. At least in theory. Yet it's probably impossible for Hollywood to make an honest film about this awful man — case in point being the new one from director Steven Soderbergh and starring Benicio Del Toro. Even the NYT sees the problem clearly, based on a screening at Cannes...The best news is that the movie is apparently four and a half hours long and in Spanish, which doesn't sound like a recipe for box-office magic. But think about it: The film is twice as long as a movie that's already bordering on too long, and it just skips over the part of Che's life (when he was serving in Castro's government) that contains some of the most difficult episodes for his hagiographers to explain away. What's next? A miniseries on Osama bin Laden that passes over 9/11?
Right... It;s getting to the stage that anti-Che (and anti-Castro) rhetoric is becoming just as tiresome as their hagiographers' simple-minded nonsense. Memo to the 1960s and its survivors: get over yourselves...

February 28, 2008

Parliament of Fools

Further to this and this, I see, thanks to Mr Worstall, that no fewer than 72 Members of Parliament have put their name to this Early Day Motion:

EDM 982

FIDEL CASTRO
20.02.2008
Burgon, Colin

That this House commends the achievements of Fidel Castro in securing first-class free healthcare and education provision for the people of Cuba despite the 44 year illegal US embargo of the Cuban economy; notes the great strides Cuba has taken during this period in many fields such as biotechnology and sport in both of which Cuba is a world leader; acknowledges the esteem in which Castro is held by the people and leaders of Africa, Asia and Latin America for leading the calls for emancipation of the world’s poorest people from slavery, hunger and the denial of human rights such as the right to life, the right to shelter, the right to healthcare and basic medicines and the right to education; welcomes the EU statement that constructive engagement with Cuba at this time is the most responsible course of action; and calls upon the Government to respect Cuba’s right to self-determination and resist the aggressive forces within the US Administration who are openly planning their own illegal transition in Cuba.

February 26, 2008

Fidel: Forever In Our Hearts...

Commenting on this post about Fidel Castro's welcome retirement, a reader wrote, quoting part of my argument:

"If conservatives – on both sides of the North Atlantic – were too ready to turn a blind eye to Pinochet's crimes, left-wingers have been equally credulous with regard to Castro's Cuban dictatorship."

When Pinochet died, Jonah Goldberg and I had an email back-and-forth about this very claim. I dispute that the level of admiration for Castro on the left is anything approaching the right's support for Pinochet. Only among the most extreme, throwback lefties would you find a good word for man. Compare with Pinochet, who received so many kind words from conservative pundits upon his passing, and who maintained friendships with Thatcher, Reagan et. al. Sorry, it's not the same.

Perhaps that's true in the United States. But not all countries are the United States. You can imagine the delight I felt then when - via Mr Eugenides - I spied this comment from Harriet Harman* MP, currently Deputy Leader of the Labour Party as she answered questions from readers of The Independent:

Fidel Castro: hero of the left, or dangerous authoritarian dictator?

Hero of the left – but time for Cuba to move on.

*Ms Harman, it should be stressed, is not a Lady of the Loony Left. On the contrary she's been identified with the right-wing of the Labour Party. True, she's also hopeless but that's another matter entirely...


February 20, 2008

Semper Fidelis For Shame

I'd actually thought Castro's retirement would prompt more of this sort of nonsense. I guess we're still waiting for Seumas Milne to pipe up in The Guardian. Still, the palm for the most idiotic thing I've seen goes to Chris Bertram:

...And, of course, Castro ran a dictatorship that has, since 1959, committed its fair share of crimes, repressions, denials of democratic rights etc. Still, I’m reminded of A.J.P. Taylor writing somewhere or other (reference please, dear readers?) that what the capitalists and their lackeys really really hated about Soviet Russia was not its tyrannical nature but the fact that there was a whole chunk of the earth’s surface where they were no longer able to operate. Ditto Cuba, for a much smaller chunk. So let’s hear it for universal literacy and decent standards of health care. Let’s hear it for the Cubans who help defeat the South Africans and their allies in Angola and thereby prepared the end of apartheid. Let’s hear it for the middle-aged Cuban construction workers who held off the US forces for a while on Grenada. Let’s hear it for Elian Gonzalez. Let’s hear it for 49 years of defiance in the face of the US blockade. Hasta la victoria siempre!

Love that gentle "Of course..."

Alternatively, as I put it today's Scotsman:

SO FAREWELL and good riddance, Fidel Castro. Only sentimental fools will miss you. The image of a small, plucky island nation holding out against the might of the United States has an obvious appeal. But life is not all an Asterix and Obelix adventure.

Franklin D Roosevelt is said to have acknowledged that the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasia Somoza was a Class A "sonofabitch", but at least "he's our sonofabitch". Like his counterpart in Chile, Augusto Pinochet, Castro has enjoyed the tolerance of many who should have known better. If conservatives – on both sides of the North Atlantic – were too ready to turn a blind eye to Pinochet's crimes, left-wingers have been equally credulous with regard to Castro's Cuban dictatorship.

His regime's achievements in health and education – always cited by Castro apologists – must be set beside the reality of an island prison in which dissent has been outlawed and the jailing of political prisoners routine. Regardless of the failures and idiocies of US policy, this has been Castro's own choice. Socialism has failed Cuba, just as it failed the Soviet Union.

Like Pinochet, Castro's successes only demand honouring in the context of his larger, wider failure. A gulag filled with literate, healthy inmates is still a gulag*; a dictator who inspires affection and respect (from some) is still, above all, a dictator.

I think US policy towards Cuba has been blind, wilfully stupid and counter-productive. The embargo is an embarrassment. But still, you know, it isn't quite good enough to argue (with some justification) that there have been more monstrous dictators than Fidel.

Norm ponders the sympathy leftists have for Castro and his ilk here. He makes this excellent point:

Nonetheless, there is a central piece of bad faith in the way...[leftist] partisans... evade a single inescapable fact: namely that, flawed as they may be, the capitalist democracies are democracies and none of the would-be anti-capitalist countries, anywhere, has managed to sustain comparably good or better democratic institutions over any length of time. Note that I do not say this means it could never happen; I don't believe that. What it does mean, however, is that the democratic institutions we are familiar with have yet to be improved upon in any of those places that some leftists are given to casting an indulgent eye upon even while they seek to distance themselves critically from the institutions they themselves benefit from and which are superior.

As for Cub's achievements? Tyler Cowan has some sound advice:

A simple checklist would start with the question of whether an apologist has visited both the Dominican Republic and Cuba.  And a non-communist Cuba could have done much better than the DR.  It is a fascinating place for visitors, but right now the quality of life in Cuba isn't close to that of the DR or for that matter Honduras, the second-biggest Latino mess in the hemisphere... It's time to stop apologizing for communist dictatorships; are you really so taken with the idea of confiscating property as to overlook decades of tyranny, impoverishment, and human misery?  Yes I am familiar with the UN social indicators; I say you need to visit each of these countries, preferably speaking Spanish, and then report back to me.

Brad Delong deals with more credulous Castro-lovers here.

*Hyperbole? Perhaps. But if you're not free to leave a country you are, to one degree or another, imprisoned.

The Mills of History Keep Grinding

The morning after the night before: a friend emails, noting Obama's humping great triumph in Joe McCarthy's old state, Wisconsin and quips:

Can you imagine if you were a rabid 1950s era McCarthy-ite and somehow you saw today's Washington Post front page - a black man is the front runner to be the next President and Castro made it all the way to 2008?

December 20, 2007

This will definitely hasten regime change in Havana

And while we're on the subject of cricket, here's the latest madness from the United States:

Cuba have been blocked from playing in their first ever international cricket tournament because of a US embargo.

Cuba had been invited to take part in the Stanford 20/20 tournament, which features 20 Caribbean teams.

But the competition is backed by US businessman Allen Stanford, who by law must ask permission to engage in commercial activity with Cuba.

Texan billionaire Stanford said on Tuesday that his application had been denied by the US government.

"We have been anxious to include the entire Caribbean in the Stanford 20/20 Cricket Tournament and I am extremely disappointed that Cuba will not be able to play," he said in a statement.

No word on whether ghastly old Fidel is a cricket fan; no word either as to whether this is really about protecting American sports - ie, baseball - from the cool breeze of cricketing competition. A reprehensible expansion of the Monroe Doctrine, clearly...

My Photo

Powered by Rollyo

Amazon

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    You Might Like...

    Google Search

    • Custom Search

    Google Ads

    • Google Ads 2
    • Google Ads

    Amazon Store

    Powered by FeedBurner

    Blog powered by TypePad