Many, many, many. If the GOP increasingly suffers from a suffocating orthodoxy, the libertarian movement (if that's not an oxymoron) is amusingly/alarmingly/pedictably/irrelevently heterodox. As Brian Doherty explains:
Then again, since libertarianism is as much a sensibility as anything else, it's scarcely surprising it should be such a divided house.
UPDATE: Dave Weigel has a characteristically good - and entertaining! - review of "a thrilling and dispiriting year for libertarian politics" under the never-out-of-fashion headline Where Did It All Go Wrong?

I just had to share this screenshot:
http://i42.tinypic.com/34y4ihk.gif
Not a photoshop, I swear.
Posted by: jagorev | January 08, 2009 at 08:18 PM
Well, the biggest problem that Libertarian has in the US right now is Ron Paul, and the "paleolibertarian" coterie of racist loons that he pals around with. Having cranky bigots like Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell as its standard bearers is the last thing that any movement needs.
Posted by: ben | January 08, 2009 at 08:35 PM
We post-Humian scepto-empiricists sneer at Johnny-come-lately libertarians.
Posted by: dearieme | January 08, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Thanks for the article
Posted by: E cig review | January 31, 2010 at 04:04 PM