Calling a spade by its proper name
James Fallows is right: it's Burma, not Myanmar. The generals can call their country whatever they like; we're under no obligation to follow their lead.
Equally, it's Bombay not Mumbai, Madras not Chennai etc etc. Do you plan to visit Venezia or Munchen? Of course you don't, so Venice and Munich it is.

I see the point, but there is some logic to the name Myanmar: the Burmese are only one ethnic group in the country and Myanmar is a more inclusive name.
Posted by: Gabriel | September 25, 2007 at 10:27 PM
I missed when military dictators took over India and changed the names to Mumbai, Chennai, etc. Not that I'm a big fan of the Hindu nationalist parties that pushed for the name changes in India, but still, I really don't get the comparison between Burma and India.
Posted by: Dave K | September 25, 2007 at 11:33 PM
I agree with you but not with your logic. Burma is Burma, yes, but I call Germany Germany and Japan Japan (and so on...) because, as far as I know, the Germans and Japanese (and so on...) are fine with that.
Stupid, point-scoring symbolism though the name-changes in Bombay/Mumbai and Madras/Chennai assuredly were, they were the democratic representatives of the inhabitants of those cities saying "We'd like you to call us this, please," and to oblige them is just common courtesy. If anyone with a credible claim to speak for the inhabitants of Burma said something similar, then I would switch.
Posted by: Keith | September 26, 2007 at 08:07 AM
hear hear! i second you on all of those - especially bombay.
http://greatganesha.com/2006/09/14/the-names-sake/
Posted by: The Great Ganesha | September 29, 2007 at 03:43 AM
In India, the issue is not just point-scoring. Bombay/Calcutta and so on were names given by the colonial/occupier British, so Indians feel it's about time the cities reverted to their non-British names (names that the British could not pronounce).
Posted by: PRJ | September 29, 2007 at 07:12 AM
Well, no one is under any obligation to follow anyone's lead when it comes to pronouncing names, Mister All-licks Muss-ee-yeah !
Posted by: shadyiyer | September 29, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Of course, in Madras (and even to a thankfully-diminishing extent in Bombay), a foreigner can't win. Call the city "Madras" in conversation with any Tamilian, and they will patronizingly advise that it has been renamed "Chennai", as though you are an imbecile or just climbed out from eleven-plus years under a rock. Call it "Chennai", and you will be told, in tones no-less patronizing, that "locals still call it "Madras".
Frankly, the Hindufication of place names is annoying as hell, is completely at odds with India's multiculturalism, and is ultimately nothing more than a stupid game in the divide-and-conquer communal politics of the Hindutva right.
As for my home town, which these idiots have renamed "Puducherry": Pondicherry then, Pondicherry now, Pondicherry forever!
mbjesq
http:memestreamblog.wordpress.com
Posted by: mbjesq | September 29, 2007 at 12:18 PM
Appalling ignorance comparing Burma with Indian cities. Indian cities reverted to *original* names and they are not non-British names. For the record, it was communists who changed Calcutta to Kolkata. Hindu nationalists changed Bombay to Mumbai and atheists changed Madras to Chennai.
It would be nice for westerners (and coconuts) to actually know things that "locals" do before posturing.
Posted by: Rao K | September 29, 2007 at 03:22 PM
I agree with the post. Myanmar is the name forced on an oppressed people. Calling the country Burma is a way of recognizing that the country is under the control of a brutal and unjust dictatorship.
Posted by: Dan R | September 29, 2007 at 11:05 PM
Burma was also a name forced on an oppressed people - unless you find British dictatorial rule less obnoxious than dictatorial rule by generals.
Posted by: tequila | September 30, 2007 at 02:35 PM
For those supporting city renaming who didnt bother checking their history, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras were founded by the British and were each a combination of a bunch of villages/islands. They were named by the British at that point and we should stick by the original names of the cities. Kolkata was the name of one of the villages that formed Calcutta and the story is similar for Bombay and Madras. So live with it - Bombay, Calcutta and Madras are the original names of the cities and its the locals who are distorting this in the native languages.
Posted by: R N | September 30, 2007 at 03:21 PM
I agree. Bombay, Calcutta and Madras existed before the British came, but as obscure and small fishing villages. The British made them what they became; three of the greatest cities of the British Empire and now, of modern India.
Bombay by the way, was named by the Portuguese as Bom Baim or in English Fair Bay. The etymology of Madras appears to be completely unknown.
Note that many locals living in these cities still unselfconsciously use the old names when speaking amongst themselves. It is weak-minded to accept the temporary decisions of parochial and cynical vote-getting "city fathers".
Posted by: Ajay Kapur | October 02, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place, i will must refer this information with reference on my website i.e www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Used Dell Computers | May 07, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place, i will must refer this information with reference on my website i.e www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Cheap Computers | May 29, 2009 at 07:17 AM
I would like to appreciate the great work done by the web master. they should post their interesting comments and make this blog interesting.... It's really great to post my comments on such a blog. www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Cheap computer | June 02, 2009 at 12:48 PM
I would like to appreciate the great work done by the web master. they should post their interesting comments and make this blog interesting.... It's really great to post my comments on such a blog. www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Cheap computer | June 02, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place, i will must refer this information with reference on my website i.e www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Cheap Computers | June 03, 2009 at 08:16 AM
Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place, i will must refer this information with reference on my website i.e www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: Cheap computer | June 06, 2009 at 08:32 AM
[...] Bonjour, I would like to thank the blog owner as he is doing a great job by providing an amazing piece of information, as well as I would also like to contribute my experience and would like to be helpful to the owner and to the comment posting people. [...] http://www.dellgx620.com/
Posted by: Dell GX620 | June 09, 2009 at 10:50 AM
im impressed by the web designer that they are using very good strategies to create interest on people... and attrect others.
Posted by: used computer | June 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM